Editing Template talk:Class guides
Warning: The database has been locked for maintenance, so you will not be able to save your edits right now. You may wish to copy and paste your text into a text file and save it for later.
The system administrator who locked it offered this explanation: We are currently working on upgrading comp.tf. Edits will be locked for most of March 2025, or until further notice. For questions, please contact staff on the comp.tf Discord. I apologise for the inconvenience.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page is not enabled for semantic in-text annotations due to namespace restrictions. Details about how to enable the namespace can be found on the configuration help page.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
I had an idea to arrange the classes in a more comp-relevant grouping than the default (Offensive, Defensive, Support) to make the template more competitive-centric. I'm not sure what the re-arrangement would be, and the fact that there is no 'concrete' grouping for the classes in competitive play leads me to believe that any sort of re-arrangement would be too alienating even for experienced comp players. Then again, if we re-group the classes to fit competitive play, it could become the basis for a competitive grouping of the 9 classes. Thinking out loud at this point :] --[[User:Garlic|garlic]] ([[User talk:Garlic|talk]]) 08:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | I had an idea to arrange the classes in a more comp-relevant grouping than the default (Offensive, Defensive, Support) to make the template more competitive-centric. I'm not sure what the re-arrangement would be, and the fact that there is no 'concrete' grouping for the classes in competitive play leads me to believe that any sort of re-arrangement would be too alienating even for experienced comp players. Then again, if we re-group the classes to fit competitive play, it could become the basis for a competitive grouping of the 9 classes. Thinking out loud at this point :] --[[User:Garlic|garlic]] ([[User talk:Garlic|talk]]) 08:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
