Editing Talk:Insomnia49
Warning: The database has been locked for maintenance, so you will not be able to save your edits right now. You may wish to copy and paste your text into a text file and save it for later.
The system administrator who locked it offered this explanation: We are currently working on upgrading comp.tf. Edits will be locked for most of March 2025, or until further notice. For questions, please contact staff on the comp.tf Discord. I apologise for the inconvenience.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page is not enabled for semantic in-text annotations due to namespace restrictions. Details about how to enable the namespace can be found on the configuration help page.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is it right to refer to a team as 'the best team'? Even with results supporting it, it is still speculation and should be avoided I think, ie: in this article, rather than talking about how HRG are the best team from North America, it'd make more sense to call them the reigning ESEA Champions, this also fits better into the editing guidelines of speculation I think. Just my opinion so I'll leave it for now until I get feedback --[[User:Bubblebobbler|Bubblebobbler]] ([[User talk:Bubblebobbler|talk]]) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (WEST) | Is it right to refer to a team as 'the best team'? Even with results supporting it, it is still speculation and should be avoided I think, ie: in this article, rather than talking about how HRG are the best team from North America, it'd make more sense to call them the reigning ESEA Champions, this also fits better into the editing guidelines of speculation I think. Just my opinion so I'll leave it for now until I get feedback --[[User:Bubblebobbler|Bubblebobbler]] ([[User talk:Bubblebobbler|talk]]) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (WEST) | ||
| − | |||
